Azahari Hassim

Is there a theological correlation between the Night Journey of Prophet Muhammad to Heaven and the prophecy mentioned in Daniel 7:13?

Please provide a detailed explanation to support this argument.

The argument connecting the Night Journey of the Prophet Muhammad to Heaven with Daniel 7 verse 13 is based on theological interpretations that draw parallels between the two events. Here’s an explanation of this argument:

1. The Night Journey of Prophet Muhammad ( الإسراء والمعراج): According to Islamic tradition, the Night Journey (الإسراء) and Ascension (المعراج) is a miraculous event in which the Prophet Muhammad was transported from Mecca to Jerusalem and then ascended through the heavens, meeting various prophets and eventually coming into the presence of Allah.
2. Daniel 7 verse 13 in the Bible: In the Book of Daniel in the Old Testament of the Bible, specifically in Daniel 7 verse 13, there is a prophecy that says: “I saw in the night visions, and behold, with the clouds of heaven there came one like a son of man, and he came to the Ancient of Days (that is, God) and was presented before him.” This verse is often interpreted as a reference to a messianic figure.

The argument connecting these two events revolves around the idea that both the Night Journey of Prophet Muhammad and the vision in Daniel 7 verse 13 involve a figure coming into the presence of God. Some scholars, particularly in comparative religion and interfaith dialogue, suggest that there are thematic similarities between these events:

Divine Revelation: In both situations, there is a significant meeting with the divine, as Prophet Muhammad ascends to the highest levels of heaven, and the individual in Daniel 7 verse 13 is brought before the “Ancient of Days,” a divine being.

Prophetic Roles: The figure in Daniel 7 verse 13 is often associated with a messianic or prophetic role. Similarly, Prophet Muhammad is considered the final prophet in Islam, and his Night Journey is seen as a confirmation of his prophethood.

It’s important to note that this argument is primarily a matter of theological interpretation and interfaith dialogue. Different scholars and religious traditions may have varying perspectives on the significance and connections between these events.

Al-Suyuti (Islamic scholar and historian):

“Daniel, peace be upon him, was among the prophets sent to the Children of Israel. He was blessed with wisdom and the ability to interpret dreams. He foretold the coming of several empires and their eventual downfall. His body was discovered during the conquest of Persia, and the Muslims respected it qand reburied it to protect it from being desecrated.”

---

What is the perspective of Islam on the biblical figure of Daniel?

In Islam, the perspective on the biblical figure of Daniel is quite respectful, though Daniel is not mentioned explicitly in the Quran. Despite this absence, Daniel is recognized and revered in Islamic tradition and literature, primarily through historical narratives and the Hadith (sayings and actions of Prophet Muhammad).

Reverence in Islamic Tradition:

1. Historical Narratives: Daniel is considered a prophet by some Muslim scholars, though this is not universally agreed upon since he is not mentioned in the Quran. His story and qualities are often cited in Islamic works, drawing from Jewish and Christian traditions. Islamic texts sometimes include stories about Daniel, portraying him as a wise and devout man. These narratives often focus on his ability to interpret dreams, his steadfast faith, and his survival in the den of lions—mirroring the biblical account.
2. Literature and Folklore: Daniel appears in various Islamic texts and is particularly noted for his prophetic wisdom and piety. In some Islamic stories, he is credited with great wisdom and miraculous abilities, similar to those found in the Book of Daniel in the Bible. For instance, he is sometimes associated with the town of Susa in Iran, where a shrine said to be his tomb is located.
3. Interpretations and Beliefs: In Islamic eschatology, Daniel is sometimes mentioned in discussions about the end times, although these references are more cultural and based on hadith literature rather than the Quran. His ability to interpret dreams and visions is often highlighted in Islamic teachings, paralleling the role he plays in the biblical narratives.

In summary, while Daniel is not a Quranic figure, his legacy as a wise and devout servant of God is acknowledged and respected within Islamic tradition, where he is often considered a prophet and a righteous man. His stories are used to impart moral lessons and to exemplify a life of faith and integrity.

---

Search

Search

---

Azahari Hassim

Does Hagar’s prophecy in Genesis 21, verse 18, predate the Torah given to Moses?

Yes, Hagar’s prophecy in Genesis 21, verse 18, predates the Torah as given to Moses. The Book of Genesis, which includes the story of Hagar, is considered part of the Torah (the first five books of the Hebrew Bible) and traditionally attributed to Moses. 

However, the events described in Genesis, including Hagar’s encounter with God and the prophecy concerning her son Ishmael, are believed to have occurred long before the time of Moses, around the patriarchal period.

The narrative in Genesis 21 describes Hagar and Ishmael in the context of Abraham’s family and is thus seen as part of the pre-Mosaic tradition. The Torah, or Pentateuch, as a compilation and codification, is generally understood to have been formalized during the time of Moses, which occurs much later in the biblical timeline. 

Therefore, the events and prophecies in Genesis can be considered as part of the earlier history before the giving of the law to Moses.

Holy Quran 7:144

قَالَ يَٰمُوسَىٰٓ إِنِّى ٱصْطَفَيْتُكَ عَلَى ٱلنَّاسِ بِرِسَٰلَٰتِى وَبِكَلَٰمِى فَخُذْ مَآ ءَاتَيْتُكَ وَكُن مِّنَ ٱلشَّٰكِرِينَ

[Allah] said, “O Moses, I have chosen you over the people with My messages and My words [to you]. So take what I have given you and be among the grateful.”

What is the argument put forth by those who support the idea that the prophethood of Muhammad is linked to Hagar’s prophecy, which predates the Torah, in contrast to Hebrew prophets who are associated with the Torah? Consequently, Muhammad, in contrast to Hebrew prophets such as Jesus, is not bound by the laws of the Torah.

Supporters of the idea that the prophethood of Muhammad is linked to Hagar’s prophecy, which predates the Torah, argue that this connection sets Muhammad apart from Hebrew prophets who are associated with the Torah. Here is a detailed explanation of their argument:

1. Pre-Torah Origins of Hagar’s Prophecy

   Proponents argue that Hagar’s prophecy, as mentioned in Genesis 21, verse 18, predates the Torah given to Moses. This prophecy concerns Hagar’s son, Ishmael, who is promised to become a great nation. This predates the formalization of the Torah, which is traditionally attributed to Moses and his time.

2. Reiteration and Fulfillment in Islamic Rituals

The Torah reiterates Hagar’s prophecy, but its fulfillment is seen in Islamic practices, particularly the Hajj pilgrimage. The Hajj, which involves rituals connected to Hagar and Ishmael, is viewed as a direct link to their legacy. This pilgrimage is a central practice in Islam, signifying the prophecy’s fulfillment and its importance in Islamic tradition.

3. Marginalization by Ancient Israelite Scribes

   It is suggested that ancient Israelite scribes attempted to downplay the significance of Hagar and Ishmael due to theological and political reasons. This marginalization aimed to elevate the prominence of Isaac and the Israelite lineage over Ishmael. The argument posits that the biblical narrative was shaped in a way that selectively emphasized aspects favorable to the Israelite lineage.

           Contrast with Hebrew Prophets

1. Association with the Torah

   Hebrew prophets are closely linked to the Torah, which is seen as the foundation of their prophetic authority. The Torah, given to Moses, contains the laws and ethical teachings that Hebrew prophets were tasked with interpreting and enforcing. This connection establishes a continuous line of prophetic tradition rooted in the Mosaic covenant.

2. Muhammad’s Independent Prophetic Lineage

   In contrast, Muhammad’s prophethood is associated with the Abrahamic covenant through Ishmael, rather than the Mosaic covenant. This distinction is significant in Islamic theology, which views Muhammad’s message as a continuation and fulfillment of the Abrahamic faith, independent of the Mosaic laws. This perspective underscores the universality of Muhammad’s revelation, intended for all humanity, rather than being confined to the specific legal and ritual practices of the Jewish people.

                 Theological Implications

1. Universal Prophetic Tradition

   By associating Muhammad with a prophecy that predates the Torah, supporters argue that prophetic messages have been universal and ongoing throughout human history. This places Islam within a broader, inclusive prophetic tradition that transcends Jewish ethnic and religious boundaries. It emphasizes the continuity of divine guidance from the time of Abraham through to Muhammad.

2. Distinct Covenants

   The argument also highlights the existence of distinct covenants in the Abrahamic religions. While the Hebrew prophets operate under the covenant of Moses and the Sinai revelation, Muhammad is seen as part of the covenant given to Abraham and Ishmael. This theological distinction reinforces the idea that different prophetic traditions are validated by separate covenants within the broader framework of Abrahamic faiths.

In summary, the argument linking Muhammad’s prophethood to Hagar’s prophecy emphasizes its pre-Torah origins, fulfillment in Islamic Hajj, and the marginalization of Hagar’s significance by ancient Israelite scribes. This perspective contrasts Muhammad’s universal and independent prophetic lineage with the Hebrew prophets’ association with the Torah, highlighting distinct covenants and a broader prophetic tradition.

Search

Search

---

Azahari Hassim

It is believe that the Kingdom of God, as announced by Jesus in Matthew 8, verse 11 to 12, signifies the end of the Jews’ role as a kingdom of priests associated with ritual sacrifices. This argument can be explained from an Islamic perspective as follows:

In Islam, the completion of prophethood through Muhammad, the final messenger, is a key belief. Therefore, the Islamic view aligns with the notion that Jesus proclamation of the kingdom of God effectively ended the Jewish role as a kingdom of priests tied to ritual sacrifices.

This is seen as part of a continuous prophetic tradition that calls for righteous living and submission to God’s will.

In Islamic theology, the Kingdom of God is perceived as God’s sovereign rule over all creation. The invitation to enter this kingdom is viewed as a call to submit to God’s will and to live according to His guidance.

Islam respects the historical role of the Children of Israel as a chosen community tasked with responsibilities and blessings, including their past as a kingdom of priests dedicated to worshiping God.

Thus, from an Islamic perspective, Jesus’ announcement about the Kingdom of God is interpreted as both a revocation of the Jews’ priestly role and a continuation of the prophetic message, emphasizing the importance of faith, righteousness, and devotion to God.”

---

Isra

The first part of the Prophet’s Night Journey, in which he traveled on the winged steed Buraq to the “furthest mosque,” identified with al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem.

From an Islamic viewpoint, Muhammad’s Night Journey to Jerusalem symbolizes the end of Judaism as a sacrificial religion, as it is linked to the former Jewish temple.

The Night Journey of Prophet Muhammad to Jerusalem holds significant importance in Islamic belief as it marks a turning point in the relationship between Islam and Judaism.

In Islamic perspective, this event signifies the end of Judaism as a sacrificial religion because it is believed that during his journey, Prophet Muhammad ascended to heaven and received instructions for the Muslim community, including the commandment to pray five times a day.

The connection to the Jewish temple in Jerusalem is also significant as it symbolizes the shift from Jewish practices to Islamic teachings. By visiting this sacred site, Prophet Muhammad demonstrated that Islam was now the true religion and successor to Judaism.

This event serves as a reminder of the historical ties between these two Abrahamic faiths while also emphasizing the unique beliefs and practices of Islam.

Overall, Muhammad’s Night Journey to Jerusalem represents a pivotal moment in Islamic history where Judaism’s role as a sacrificial religion came to an end, paving the way for Islam to emerge as a distinct and influential faith.

Miraj

The second part of Prophet Muhammad’s Night Journey, when he ascended from Jerusalem to the heavens.

Could it be argued that Muhammad is the “son of man” and that Islam symbolizes the “kingdom of God” as suggested in Surah 4 verse 54 and Surah 2 verse 89 of the Quran? It is worth noting that Islam arose following the Byzantine Empire, also known as the Eastern Roman Empire.

The idea that Muhammad might be identified with the “son of man” from the Book of Daniel and that Islam represents the “kingdom of God” is an interpretation that has been proposed by some, particularly within Islamic thought, but it’s essential to understand the contexts of both religious traditions.

Quranic Verses: 

Surah 4 verse 54 (An-Nisa) reads: “Or do they envy people for what Allah has given them of His bounty? But we had already given the family of Abraham the Scripture and wisdom and conferred upon them a great kingdom.”

Surah 2 verse 89 (Al-Baqarah) states: “And when there came to them a Book from Allah confirming that which was with them – although before they used to pray for victory against those who disbelieved – but [then] when there came to them that which they recognized, they disbelieved in it; so the curse of Allah will be upon the disbelievers.”

Both verses make reference to the recognition of a divine revelation or guidance that was granted to previous communities and then to the community of Muhammad. The emphasis in these verses is on the continuity of prophetic revelation and the recognition (or rejection) of that revelation by its recipients.

Interpretation:  

While the emergence of Islam after the Byzantine (Eastern Roman) Empire is historically accurate, directly equating Muhammad to the “son of man” in Daniel based on these Quranic verses might be a stretch when considering the original contexts and intentions of both the Book of Daniel and the mentioned Surahs. However, like any religious interpretation, views can be diverse, and some might see parallels or symbolic connections.

It’s also important to note that the Quran itself doesn’t explicitly identify Muhammad as the “son of man” from Daniel. Traditional Islamic belief holds that Muhammad is the last prophet in a long line of prophets, including figures like Abraham, Moses, David, and Jesus, and that Islam’s emergence is a continuation and finalization of the monotheistic tradition.

Conclusion:  

While there might be intriguing parallels to explore, it’s essential to approach such interpretations with an understanding of the historical, theological, and textual contexts of both traditions. Directly equating Muhammad with the “son of man” from Daniel based on the Quranic verses would require a broader interpretive framework that takes into account various other factors, historical events, and theological considerations.

Some scholars believe the Night Journey of the Prophet Muhammad to Heaven is theologically related to Daniel 7 verse 13. How is this argument explained?

The argument connecting the Night Journey of the Prophet Muhammad to Heaven with Daniel 7 verse 13 is based on theological interpretations that draw parallels between the two events. Here’s an explanation of this argument:

1. The Night Journey of Prophet Muhammad (Isra and Mi’raj):

According to Islamic tradition, the Night Journey (Isra) and Ascension (Mi’raj) is a miraculous event in which the Prophet Muhammad was transported from Mecca to Jerusalem and then ascended through the heavens, meeting various prophets and eventually coming into the presence of Allah.

2. Daniel 7 verse 13 in the Bible:

In the Book of Daniel in the Old Testament of the Bible, specifically in Daniel 7 verse 13, there is a prophecy that says: “I saw in the night visions, and behold, with the clouds of heaven there came one like a son of man, and he came to the Ancient of Days (that is, God)  and was presented before him.” This verse is often interpreted as a reference to a messianic figure.

The argument connecting these two events revolves around the idea that both the Night Journey of Prophet Muhammad and the vision in Daniel 7 verse 13 involve a figure coming into the presence of God. Some scholars, particularly in comparative religion and interfaith dialogue, suggest that there are thematic similarities between these events:

Divine Revelation:

In both cases, there is a profound encounter with the divine, with the Prophet Muhammad ascending to the highest levels of heaven and the figure in Daniel 7 verse 13 being presented before the “Ancient of Days,” a divine entity.

Prophetic Roles:

The figure in Daniel 7 verse 13 is often associated with a messianic or prophetic role. Similarly, Prophet Muhammad is considered the final prophet in Islam, and his Night Journey is seen as a confirmation of his prophethood.

Search

Search

---

Azahari Hassim

Hagar, an Egyptian woman with no power or status, is the first person in Scripture to be visited by an angel and the only person in Scripture to give God a name—El Roi, “the God who sees me.” In the midst of her pain and struggle, Hagar receives God’s blessing and promises.

It is believed that the prophecy of Hagar predated the Torah revealed to the Israelites. The Torah reiterated her prophecy, whose fulfillment is realized in the ritual Hajj of Islam. Some argue that the scribes of ancient Israelites attempted to tone down its importance. How is the argument articulated?

The argument as presented suggests that the prophecy of Hagar, which is believed to have predated the Torah, finds its fulfillment in the Islamic ritual of Hajj, and that the scribes of ancient Israel attempted to diminish its significance. Here’s how this argument is explained:

1. Pre Torah origins: This argument posits that the prophecy of Hagar and her descendants, including Ishmael, existed prior to the revelation of the Torah to Moses. Supporters of this view often point to the genealogical and historical connections between Hagar and Ishmael and the founding of the Arab people.
2. Prophecy reiterated in Torah: The claim is made that the Torah, when it was revealed to the Israelites, reiterated and acknowledged the prophecy related to Hagar and Ishmael. This acknowledgment can be found in the biblical narrative where Hagar and Ishmael’s story is mentioned.
3. Importance of the Hajj ritual: Proponents then assert that the fulfillment of Hagar’s prophecy, as reiterated in the Torah, can be seen in the Islamic ritual of Hajj. They argue that Hajj, which is a pilgrimage to the Kaaba in Mecca, Saudi Arabia, is seen as a direct link to Hagar and Ishmael and represents the fulfillment of their destiny. This ritual is regarded as a significant practice in Islam and is central to the religious identity of Muslims.
4. Suppression of Hagar’s significance: The argument continues by suggesting that the scribes of ancient Israel attempted to downplay the importance of Hagar and her descendants, including Ishmael, due to theological and political motivations. It is proposed that, in shaping the biblical narrative, these scribes might have marginalized or selectively emphasized certain aspects to elevate the prominence of Isaac and the Israelite lineage over Ishmael.

It’s important to note that this argument reflects a particular perspective and interpretation. There are different viewpoints on this topic, and scholars hold a wide array of opinions regarding the relationship between biblical narratives, biblical redaction, and the Islamic tradition.

Renita J. Weems (biblical scholar and author):

Hagar’s story is about an African slave woman who hears God, names God, and survives abuse. Her narrative invites us to consider the experiences of those who are often overlooked and undervalued.”

Mary and Hagar in Islam: Prominence and Reverence in Tradition and Ritual

In Islam, who is more prominent, Mary, the mother of Jesus, or Hagar, the mother of Ishmael?

In Islam, both Mary, the mother of Jesus, and Hagar, the mother of Ishmael, hold significant and respected positions, but their prominence is contextual and varies in different aspects of Islamic tradition.

1. Mary in Islam: Mary is highly revered in Islam and is the only woman mentioned by name in the Quran. She has an entire chapter (Surah) named after her, that is Surah Maryam (Chapter 19). She is celebrated for her piety, chastity, and the miraculous birth of Jesus. Maryam is often cited as an example of virtue and is one of the most honored women in Islamic tradition.
2. Hagar in Islam: Hagar is also a revered figure, especially for her role in the story of Prophet Abraham. Her search for water for her son Ishmael in the desert is commemorated by Muslims during the Hajj pilgrimage in the ritual of Sa’i, where pilgrims walk between the hills of Safa and Marwah. Hagar’s story symbolizes faith, perseverance, and trust in God’s providence.

The prominence of each figure can be contextually determined:

Religiously and Scripturally: Mary has a more detailed narrative in the Quran and is explicitly named, highlighting her unique status.

Culturally and Ritually: Hagar’s legacy is physically re-enacted by millions of Muslims annually during Hajj, giving her a prominent ritualistic role in Islamic practice.

Both figures, however, are deeply respected and are seen as exemplary models of faith and devotion in their own right. Their stories and the lessons derived from them are integral to Islamic teachings.

---

Search

Search

---

Azahari Hassim

Does the Quran mention Muhammad as the Messiah whom the Jews await?

In the Quran, Muhammad is not explicitly referred to as the Messiah whom the Jews await. However, there is an indirect mention in Surah 2, verse 89, that can be interpreted in this context.

Surah 2, verse 89, states,

“And when there came to them a Book from Allah confirming that which was with them – although before they used to pray for victory against those who disbelieved – but [then] when there came to them that which they recognized, they disbelieved in it; so the curse of Allah will be upon the disbelievers.”

This verse is believed by some scholars and interpreters to refer to a prophecy mentioned in Jewish scriptures about a future prophet who would come after Moses. According to this interpretation, the Jews were awaiting this promised prophet or Messiah.

Muslims believe that Muhammad is the final prophet sent by Allah and consider him as fulfilling various prophecies mentioned in previous religious texts. Therefore, some Muslims interpret Surah 2, verse 89, as indirectly referring to Muhammad as the awaited Messiah.

It’s important to note that interpretations of religious texts can vary among different scholars and individuals. While some may see a connection between Muhammad and the awaited Messiah based on this verse, others may have different interpretations or understandings.

George Bernard Shaw:

“I have studied him – the wonderful man – and in my opinion far from being an anti-Christ, he must be called the Savior of Humanity.”

Jesus, Muhammad, and the Davidic Messiah

In Matthew 22, verse 45, Jesus posed a question to the Pharisees. How can the Messiah be considered David’s descendant if David himself refers to him as ‘Lord’?

The following is an excerpt from Willmington’s Bible Handbook notes on Matthew 22, verses 42 to 45:

Jesus now asked a question of the Pharisees: They accepted Psalm 110 as a prediction of the Messiah, yet they considered that he would be a merely human descendant of David. If that were the case, asked Jesus, why did David refer to him as “Lord”? Both the deity and humanity of the Messiah are taught clearly in the Old Testament but the leaders could not see it. Jesus had finally silenced his critics once and for all.

Some Islamic scholars believe that, although Jesus was considered a messiah, he never publicly claimed to be the Davidic messiah whom the Jews were expecting. Moreover, it appears that in Matthew 22, verses 42 to 45, Jesus did not emphasize his divinity as most Christian commentators claim, but rather rejected the notion that the Messiah would be a descendant of David.

Islamic scholars argue that Jesus did not refer to himself but to someone other than him, that is Prophet Muhammad who was seated at the right hand of God. Similarly, while Jesus understood himself to be a prophet, he never publicly claimed to be the prophet mentioned in Deuteronomy 18, verse 18. How is this argument explained?

Islamic scholars present a nuanced interpretation of Jesus’ role as the Messiah and his relationship to the prophecies in the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament. Their arguments often center around specific biblical passages and the broader theological context within Islam.

Jesus as the Messiah and the Davidic Lineage

In Islam, Jesus (Isa) is recognized as the Messiah (Al-Masih), but this title does not carry the same connotations as it does in Christian theology. The Quran refers to Jesus as the Messiah eleven times, emphasizing his role as a prophet and messenger of God rather than a divine figure or a political savior from the line of David. This interpretation aligns with the Islamic view that Jesus did not claim divinity or a unique messianic kingship in the way that some Jewish and Christian traditions suggest.

Interpretation of Matthew 22, verses 42 to 45

In Matthew 22, verses 42 to 45, Jesus questions the Pharisees about the Messiah’s lineage, asking why David calls the Messiah “Lord” if the Messiah is his son. Some Islamic scholars have interpreted this passage as indicating that Jesus was referring to someone other than himself. Jesus was distancing himself from the traditional Jewish expectation of a Davidic Messiah. They contend that Jesus denied the future Messiah’s lineage from David and instead highlighted an inconsistent interpretation of messianic prophecy by the scribes.

Jesus and Prophet Muhammad

Some Islamic scholars extend this interpretation to suggest that Jesus was alluding to another figure who would fulfill the messianic expectations more completely. They propose that this messianic figure is Prophet Muhammad, who is considered the Seal of the Prophets in Islam and is believed to have brought the final and complete revelation from God. This perspective is supported by the belief that Jesus foretold the coming of Muhammad, aligning with the Islamic view that all prophets, including Jesus, pointed towards the final messenger.

Jesus and Deuteronomy 18, verse 18

Regarding Deuteronomy 18, verse 18, which speaks of a prophet like Moses, Islamic scholars argue that Jesus did not publicly claim to be this prophet. Instead, they believe that this prophecy refers to Muhammad, who, like Moses, brought a comprehensive law and led a community of believers. This interpretation is consistent with the Islamic view that Muhammad fulfills the role of the final prophet, bringing the last and complete message from God.

Conclusion

Islamic scholars argue that Jesus, although being a messiah like other messiahs before him, did not claim to be the Davidic Messiah in the traditional Jewish sense and that he did not see himself as the prophet mentioned in Deuteronomy 18, verse 18. Instead, they believe that these roles were fulfilled by Prophet Muhammad. This interpretation is rooted in a broader theological framework that sees Jesus as a significant prophet and messenger who foretold the coming of Muhammad, the final prophet.

---

---

Search

Search

---

Azahari Hassim

Do Jews today still believe that they are God’s chosen people, even after the loss of their two temples which could be seen as a sign of divine abandonment?

The belief that Jews are God’s chosen people is a fundamental aspect of Jewish faith and identity. This belief is based on the covenant between God and the Jewish people as described in the Hebrew Bible. The loss of the two temples in Jerusalem (the First Temple destroyed by the Babylonians in 586 BCE and the Second Temple destroyed by the Romans in 70 CE) has been interpreted by some as a sign of divine punishment or abandonment.

However, most Jews today still believe that they are God’s chosen people despite these historical events. They see the destruction of the temples as part of their history and theology, rather than evidence of being abandoned by God. Instead, many Jews view these events as opportunities for spiritual growth, renewal, and resilience.

Furthermore, Jewish tradition teaches that even in times of exile or suffering, God remains present with His chosen people. The concept of “chosenness” does not mean superiority over other peoples but rather a responsibility to uphold ethical values and contribute positively to the world.

In conclusion, while some may question how Jews can still believe they are God’s chosen people after losing their temples, for many Jews this belief remains central to their faith and identity despite historical challenges.

“Do not be grieved, my sons. There is another way of atoning for Israel’s sins which is no less efficacious. What is it? Acts of loving-kindness, as it is said, ‘For I desire mercy, not sacrifice.’”

Rabbi Yochanan ben Zakai

From a biblical perspective, can Judaism be characterized as the religion of sacrifice?

From a biblical perspective, Judaism can indeed be characterized as the religion of sacrifice. Sacrifice played a central role in the religious practice of ancient Israel as prescribed in the Hebrew Bible. In the book of Leviticus, detailed instructions are given for various types of sacrifices, including burnt offerings, grain offerings, sin offerings, guilt offerings, and peace offerings. These sacrifices were seen as a way for the Israelites to seek forgiveness for sins, express gratitude to God, and maintain a relationship with God.

The concept of sacrifice is deeply rooted in Jewish tradition and history, with the most significant sacrifices being those performed in the Temple in Jerusalem. However, after the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE, the practice of animal sacrifice ceased, and Judaism evolved to focus more on prayer, study of the Torah, and acts of loving-kindness as forms of worship.

While sacrifice continues to hold symbolic significance in Jewish liturgy and ritual, modern Judaism places greater emphasis on ethical behavior, personal repentance, and moral responsibility. Overall, Judaism can be characterized as a religion that has evolved over time, with sacrifice being an important aspect of its historical and theological foundation.

From an Islamic viewpoint, Muhammad’s Night Journey to Jerusalem symbolizes the end of Judaism as a sacrificial religion, as it is linked to the former Jewish temple.

Muhammad’s Night Journey to Jerusalem, known as “Isra and Mi’raj”, holds significant religious and historical importance. This event is described in the Qur’an and Islamic traditions as a miraculous journey where Muhammad was transported from Mecca to Jerusalem, specifically to the Temple Mount, and then ascended to heaven. The journey is seen as a pivotal moment in Islamic history, reinforcing the connection between Islam and the earlier Abrahamic religions, particularly Judaism.

Theological Significance

The Night Journey is often interpreted as a symbol of the transition from Judaism to Islam, emphasizing the continuity and the eventual supersession of Islam over Judaism. The journey to Jerusalem, a city deeply sacred to Jews, and the subsequent ascension from the Temple Mount, underscores the shift in religious significance from the Jewish Temple to the Islamic holy sites. This transition is further highlighted by the construction of the Dome of the Rock and Al-Aqsa Mosque on the Temple Mount, which became central to Islamic worship and identity.

Historical Context

Historically, the Night Journey and the subsequent construction of Islamic monuments in Jerusalem were also politically motivated. The Umayyad dynasty, which ruled the Islamic empire after Muhammad’s death, sought to elevate Jerusalem’s status to compete with Mecca, which was controlled by a rival faction. By building the Dome of the Rock and Al-Aqsa Mosque, the Umayyads aimed to create a rival religious center that would attract pilgrims and bolster their political power.

Religious Practices

The Night Journey also influenced Islamic religious practices. Initially, Muslims prayed towards Jerusalem (Al-Aqsa Mosque) for a period of 16 or 17 months after migrating to Medina. Later, the direction of prayer (qibla) was changed to face the Kaaba in Mecca, following a revelation received by Muhammad. This change underscored the centrality of Mecca in Islam while maintaining Jerusalem’s importance as a sacred site.

Contemporary Significance

Today, the Temple Mount, known as Haram al-Sharif in Islam, remains a highly contested site, central to both Jewish and Islamic religious identities. The status quo agreement governing the site aims to maintain peace by restricting Jewish prayer and allowing Muslim worship. However, tensions often flare, with Palestinian terror groups using the site’s religious significance to incite violence against Israel.

Conclusion

In summary, from an Islamic perspective, Muhammad’s Night Journey to Jerusalem symbolizes the transition from Judaism to Islam, emphasizing the continuity and eventual supersession of Islam. The journey and the subsequent construction of Islamic monuments on the Temple Mount underscore the shift in religious significance from the Jewish Temple to Islamic holy sites, reflecting both theological and political motivations.

Search

Search

---

Azahari Hassim

Here is how the Jewish scribe manipulated Ishmael’s story:

1. The age of Ishmael at the time of his departure from Abraham’s house.
2. Abraham’s son, who was offered as a sacrifice.

Some people think that Ishmael, when sent away by Abraham in the Torah, was just a young child, not a teenager, based on the phrase “and he grew” in Genesis 21, verse 20. They point out that the Hebrew word “yelid” is used for both Ishmael and baby Moses (Exodus 2, verse 6). How do they explain this argument?

The argument is articulated by pointing out the use of the Hebrew word “yelid” in both Genesis 21, verses 14 to 15, and Exodus 2, verse 6. In these verses, “yelid” is used to describe both Ishmael and infant Moses. Supporters of the argument claim that since “yelid” is used to describe Moses when he was an infant, it should also be understood to mean that Ishmael was still a young child in Genesis 21, verse 20.

Additionally, the phrase “and he grew” in Genesis 21, verse 20, is interpreted by some to imply that Ishmael was still in the process of growing and developing, suggesting a younger age. They argue that if Ishmael were already a teenager or older, it would not be necessary to mention his growth.

It should be noted, however, that interpretations of biblical texts can vary, and different scholars or readers may have different understandings of the intended meaning.

Why are the statements about Abraham wanting to sacrifice his son in Genesis 22, verse 2, and verse 16 problematic? In one case, the son is referred to as “the only,” while in the other, the name of the son is not mentioned.

The story of Abraham being tested to sacrifice his son in Genesis 22 has raised some interpretative questions and concerns among readers. Specifically, the statements as mentioned in verses 2 and 16 are problematic for a couple of reasons.

First, in Genesis 22, verse 2, when God calls Abraham to sacrifice his son, Isaac is described as “your only son.” However, this raises a discrepancy because at that point, Abraham already had an older son named Ishmael, born to Hagar. Ishmael was not mentioned in this context, leading to confusion regarding why Isaac was referred to as the “only” son. This linguistic inconsistency has led some scholars to suggest that the story might have been composed independently from other narratives that mention Ishmael.

Secondly, in Genesis 22, verse 16, after Abraham successfully passes the test and God intervenes by providing a ram as a substitute sacrifice, God blesses Abraham and says, “because you have not withheld your son, your only son.” This repetition of “your only son” raises another concern since Isaac’s name is not mentioned. It seems that the narrative originally presents the unnamed and only son of Abraham, alluding to Ishmael who lived as Abraham’s only son for almost 14 years before Isaac was born.

These discrepancies may be due to several factors, such as different sources or traditions being woven together, intentional theological messaging, or even potential editorial modifications over time. Scholars have examined these issues and proposed various explanations to reconcile the inconsistencies, but it remains a topic of debate and interpretation.

Ultimately, the problematic nature of these statements arises from the textual and narrative intricacies within the story, which have led to questions about authorship, redaction, and theological implications.

RASHI’S COMMENTARY (Genesis 21:14)

and the child: (Gen. Rabbah 53:13) He also placed the child (Ishmael) on her shoulder, because Sarah had cast an evil eye upon him, and he was seized by a fever so that he could not walk on his feet.

Islamic Hajj as a reflection of alterations in the Torah

There is an argument among scholars regarding the significance of Hajj in Islam as a restored religion tracing back to Abraham. It is posited that Ishmael was exiled as a young child well before the birth of Isaac, and that Ishmael, rather than Isaac, was the intended sacrifice. How is this argument articulated?

The argument regarding the significance of Hajj in Islam as a restored religion tracing back to Abraham, and the associated narrative involving Ishmael and Isaac, is articulated through several key points:

1. Lineage and Prophetic Tradition:
   In Islamic tradition, Hajj is deeply connected to the figure of Abraham (Ibrahim). Muslims believe that Abraham, along with his son Ishmael (Ismail), played a foundational role in establishing the rites of Hajj. The Kaaba, the central structure around which Hajj is performed, is believed to have been built by Abraham and Ishmael.
2. The Story of Ishmael and Isaac:
   Exile of Ishmael: According to Islamic narratives, long before Isaac was born, Ishmael and his mother Hagar were settled by Abraham in the desert of Mecca, which is where the Zamzam well miraculously appeared to sustain both of Hagar and her infant son Ishmael. This event is commemorated during the Hajj. The Sacrifice: Islamic tradition holds that it was Ishmael, not Isaac, who was the intended sacrifice. This is based on interpretations of the Quran, specifically Surah 37, verses 100 to 113, where it is generally understood that the son who was to be sacrificed was Ishmael. According to the sequence of events in the Quran, the promise of Isaac’s birth comes after the story of sacrifice, indicating that Ishmael is the son in question.
   This contrasts with the Judeo-Christian tradition, which identifies Isaac as the intended sacrifice.
3. Symbolic Acts of Hajj: The rites of Hajj include reenactments and commemorations of events from the lives of Abraham, Hagar, and Ishmael. For instance:

The Sa’i, which involves walking seven times between the hills of Safa and Marwah, commemorates Hagar’s desperate search for water for her infant son Ishmael.

The stoning of the Jamarat represents Abraham’s rejection of Satan’s temptation, which is believed to have occurred when he was about to sacrifice Ishmael.

4. Restoration of Abrahamic Monotheism:
   Islam views itself as a continuation and restoration of the pure monotheistic faith of Abraham. The Hajj serves as a means to reconnect with the Abrahamic legacy, emphasizing monotheism, obedience to God, and the unity of the Muslim community.

In summary, the argument hinges on the belief that Ishmael, rather than Isaac, was central to the narrative of sacrifice and that the rites of Hajj are rooted in the events of Abraham’s life as they unfolded in Mecca with Ishmael. This perspective underscores the significance of Hajj in Islam and its connection to Abraham as a pivotal prophet in the monotheistic tradition.

---

Search

Search

---

Azahari Hassim

In Genesis, chapter 21 and verse 18, an important prophecy and interaction between God and Hagar regarding Ishmael is mentioned.

The verse states, “Arise, lift up the lad and hold him with your hand, for I will make him a great nation.

One hypothesis proposes that the prophethood of the Hebrew prophets is tied to the Torah given to Moses, whereas Muhammad’s prophethood is associated with the prophecy of Hagar which predates the Torah. How is this idea presented?

The hypothesis you mention explores the relationship and distinctions between the prophethood of the Hebrew prophets and that of Muhammad, focusing on their respective biblical and theological foundations. This idea can be presented and analyzed through various religious, historical, and scriptural perspectives:

The prophethood of the Hebrew prophets is often seen as being linked directly to the Torah, which according to Jewish tradition, was given to Moses by God on Mount Sinai. This link is crucial because it establishes a continuous line of prophetic authority and teaching that is rooted in the laws and ethical teachings of the Torah.

The prophets following Moses are considered to have the role of interpreting, enforcing, and expanding upon the Torah’s teachings.

In contrast, Muhammad’s prophethood is sometimes associated with the prophecy attributed to Hagar. Hagar, according to the Genesis account, was the servant of Abraham and Sarah, and mother of Ishmael, who is considered by Muslims to be an ancestor of Muhammad.

This association is used to argue that Muhammad’s prophetic lineage predates the Mosaic Torah and is linked instead to Abrahamic covenant through Ishmael.

This hypothesis suggests that there are distinct covenants in the Abrahamic religions that validate different prophetic traditions. The Hebrew prophets fall under the covenant of Moses and the Sinai revelation, while Muhammad is considered under the covenant given to Abraham and Ishmael (as Hagar’s son).

This distinction is important in Islamic theology which views Islam as a continuation and fulfillment of Abrahamic faith, independent of the Mosaic laws.

The idea also touches upon the nature of the revelations received by the prophets. The Torah is often viewed as a national revelation aimed at the Jewish people, containing civil, moral, and ceremonial laws specifically designed for them.

In contrast, Muhammad’s revelation (the Quran) is considered universal, intended for all humanity, and not tied to the specific legal and ritual practices of the Jews.

By associating Muhammad with a prophecy that predates the Torah, this hypothesis also underscores the notion that prophetic messages have been universal and ongoing throughout human history. This could be seen as an attempt to place Islam within a broader, inclusive prophetic tradition that transcends Jewish ethnic and religious boundaries.

---

PROPHET

An inspired messenger called by God to declare His will (Ezra 5:2). Prophets were described as God’s servants (Zech. 1:6), watchmen (Ezek. 3:17), and holy men (2 Pet. 1:21). In the N.T. the prophets were cited as a noble example of patient suffering (Jas. 5:10). Another word for prophet is seer.

The Miraculous Preservation of Pharaoh’s Body: The Connection to Muhammad as the Prophet Like Moses

Surah 10, verse 92, reads:

“Today We will preserve your body (O Pharaoh), so that you become a sign for those after you. But most people are heedless of Our signs.”

Some scholars contend that the discovery of Ramses’ body in modern times is viewed as a miraculous event in the Quran, specifically in Surah 10, verse 92. It resembles Moses’ parting of the Red Sea. As a result, they argue that Muhammad is the prophet mentioned in Deuteronomy 18, verse 18, similar to Moses. How do they express their argument?

The scholars who make this argument typically point to several key points to support their claim:

1. Discovery of Ramses’ body: They argue that the discovery of Pharaoh Ramses II’s body in modern times is a significant event that aligns with the story of Pharaoh’s body being preserved as a sign in Surah 10, verse 92 of the Quran. This miraculous preservation of Pharaoh’s body is seen as a fulfillment of that prophecy.
2. Resemblance to Moses’ parting of the Red Sea: The scholars suggest that the discovery of Ramses’ body can be seen as a parallel to the miracle of Moses parting the Red Sea, as both events involve extraordinary occurrences related to Pharaoh and Moses. This parallel further strengthens the connection between the two stories.
3. Muhammad as the prophet like Moses: In Deuteronomy 18, verse 18, the Bible mentions the coming of a prophet like Moses, whom God will raise up among the brethren of Israelites. Some scholars argue that Muhammad fits the description of this prophet due to similarities in their roles, teachings, and experiences with prophethood.

By combining these points, scholars argue that the discovery of Ramses’ body, the resemblance to Moses’ story, and the identification of Muhammad as the prophet like Moses provide evidence for the divine inspiration of the Quran and Muhammad’s status as a prophet in the line of Moses.

Search

Search

---

Azahari Hassim

Do Ishmaelites possess a distinct tradition that traces back to their forefather, apart from the biblical narrative?

The Ishmaelites, as referred to in various historical and religious texts, are traditionally considered to be the descendants of Ishmael, the first son of Abraham and Hagar. Ishmael is an important figure in Judeo-Christian and Islamic traditions, but the traditions and histories diverge in significant ways across these faiths, particularly in Islam.

In Biblical Narrative:

In the Bible, particularly the Book of Genesis, Ishmael is portrayed as the elder half-brother of Isaac. The narrative describes how he and his mother Hagar were sent away into the desert by Abraham at the behest of Sarah (Isaac’s mother).

The biblical narrative primarily depicts Ishmael as the progenitor of the Ishmaelites, often considered ancestors of the Arab peoples. However, detailed traditions specifically tracing back to Ishmael in terms of rituals, laws, or unique religious practices distinct from later Jewish or Christian traditions are not extensively documented within the Bible itself.

In Islamic Tradition:

In Islamic tradition, however, Ishmael (Ismail in Arabic) holds a significantly different and more detailed historical and spiritual legacy. Islam regards Ishmael as a prophet and an ancestor of Muhammad, which is distinct from the biblical account in several key aspects:

Foundation of Mecca:

Islamic traditions hold that Ishmael and his father Abraham were involved in the rebuilding of the Kaaba in Mecca, which is the holiest site in Islam.

The Hajj Ritual:

Many rituals performed during the Hajj (the Islamic pilgrimage to Mecca) are commemorated in the context of events involving Ishmael and Abraham. For instance, the ritual of the Sa’i, walking between the hills of Safa and Marwah, is a re-enactment of Hagar’s search for water for her baby son Ishmael.

Sacrifice:

The Islamic festival of Eid al-Adha commemorates the willingness of Abraham to sacrifice his son in obedience to God’s command, which in Islamic tradition is believed to have been Ishmael, rather than Isaac as in the Judeo-Christian tradition.

Cultural and Historical Perspective:

Beyond religious texts, the identity and historical interpretations of the Ishmaelites have evolved in various cultures. In some traditions, the Ishmaelites are often conflated with Arab tribes, and thus Ishmael is considered an important forefather of Arabs. This lineage has sometimes been used historically to claim a shared ancestry for Arab peoples.

Conclusion:

While the biblical narrative does not extensively detail distinct traditions that trace back specifically to Ishmael separate from broader Jewish and Christian practices, Islamic tradition provides a rich, detailed cultural and religious heritage tracing back to Ishmael.

This includes specific rituals and celebrations that are integral to Islamic practice today. These distinctions highlight the varying ways in which the figure of Ishmael has been revered and remembered across different cultures and religions.

Martin Luther (1483–1546):

“The Turk [Muslim] is the rod of the wrath of the Lord our God… If we were such Christians as we ought to be, the Turk would not have grown so powerful, but he would have stayed in his own land.”

Midrashic and Islamic Interpretations of Abraham’s Sacrifice: The Identity of the ‘Only Son’

What is the explanation of the Midrash about Isaac being called “thy only son” when God ordered Abraham to sacrifice his son? In Islamic tradition, it is Ishmael and not Isaac, whom God instructed Abraham to sacrifice his son.

The Midrash, which is a form of rabbinic literature that provides interpretative commentary on the Torah, offers several explanations for why Isaac is referred to as Abraham’s “only son” in the context of the Akedah (the Binding of Isaac). Here are some key points from the Midrashic perspective:

The Midrash explains that while Abraham had two sons, Isaac held a unique status as the son of the covenant. He was born to Sarah, Abraham’s wife, and was seen as the fulfillment of God’s promise. Isaac is considered the spiritual heir of Abraham, chosen to carry on the legacy of monotheism and the covenant with God.

In some Midrashic accounts, when God says “your only son,” Abraham responds by saying he has two sons. God then specifies “the one whom you love,” and Abraham says he loves both. Finally, God says “Isaac,” clarifying His command. The phrase “only son” is interpreted to mean the son who is singularly devoted to God, emphasizing Isaac’s spiritual qualities rather than his birth order.

Some rabbinical commentators suggest that the Hebrew word for “only” (יחיד) can also mean “unique” or “special,” rather than strictly “sole.” The use of “only son” is seen as part of the test, emphasizing the magnitude of what God is asking Abraham to sacrifice.

In contrast, the Islamic tradition, as recorded in the Quran, identifies Ishmael as the son whom Abraham was commanded to sacrifice. The Quranic narrative does not explicitly name the son, but Islamic tradition and many Muslim scholars have historically identified him as Ishmael. This is partly based on the sequence of events in the Quran, which suggests that the promise of Isaac’s birth came after the sacrifice narrative, implying Ishmael was the son involved.

The differences between the Jewish and Islamic narratives have been the subject of theological discussions and interpretations. Some scholars suggest that each tradition emphasizes different aspects of the story to highlight their theological and historical narratives.

While the Islamic tradition interprets the sacrificial son to be Ishmael based on him being the firstborn, Judaism relies on the Torah’s explicit identification of Isaac and his special covenantal status to explain why Isaac is called the “only son” in this context. The two traditions remain at odds on this important narrative.

In summary, the explanation of the Midrash about Isaac being called “thy only son” is a matter of religious interpretation, with Jewish and Islamic traditions holding different views on who was the son intended for sacrifice.

---

Search

Search

---

Azahari Hassim

Some believe that Isaiah 60, verse 7, is related to the Hajj ritual, and is the fulfillment of Hagar’s prophecy regarding Ishmael in Genesis 21, verse 18. How is this interpretation presented?

This is an interesting question. The interpretation that Isaiah 60, verse 7, is related to the Hajj ritual and the fulfillment of Hagar’s prophecy regarding Ishmael is based on the following assumptions:

The verse reads:

“All the flocks of Kedar will be gathered to you, The rams of Nebaioth will serve you; They will go up on My altar with acceptance, And I will glorify My glorious house.”

The flocks of Kedar and the rams of Nebaioth in Isaiah 60, verse 7, refer to the descendants of Ishmael, who was the son of Abraham and Hagar, and the ancestor of the Arabs. Kedar and Nebaioth were two of Ishmael’s sons (Genesis 25, verse 13).

The altar and the glorious house mentioned in Isaiah 60, verse 7, refer to the Kaaba. The Kaaba is a sacred building in Mecca that has a cube shape. Muslims believe it was constructed by Abraham and Ishmael. It serves as the direction of prayer and is also the destination for the Hajj pilgrimage.

The acceptance of the offerings on the altar and the glorification of the house in Isaiah 60, verse 7, refer to Muslims performing their Hajj, known as the Feast of Sacrifice. This sacrifice is performed in remembrance of Prophet Abraham’s willingness to sacrifice his son Ishmael and as a demonstration of submission to Allah’s will.

Furthermore, it is a prophecy of God’s acceptance and blessing of the Ishmaelites, who worship Him at the Kaaba in sincerity and submission, as He promised Hagar in Genesis 21, verse 18,

“I will make him into a great nation.”

This interpretation is presented by some Muslim scholars and commentators, who see it as a proof of the truth and validity of Islam and the Hajj ritual.

Ibn Battuta 1304 – 1368

“The Kaaba is the most sacred place on Earth, a focal point of devotion for millions of Muslims. To behold it is to feel a profound connection to the divine.”

The Prophecy of Hagar and Its Fulfillment: A Comparative Analysis of Genesis 21:18 and Isaiah 60:7

There is a belief that the prophecy of Hagar in Genesis 21, verse 18, holds more weight than Isaiah 60, verse 7, which is linked to and completes the former. How is this understanding conveyed?

The belief that the prophecy of Hagar in Genesis 21, verse 18, holds more weight than Isaiah 60, verse 7, which is linked to and completes the former, can be understood through a close examination of the biblical texts and their contexts. Here’s how this understanding is conveyed:

1. Genesis 21, verse 18 (The Prophecy of Hagar).

This verse is part of the story where God speaks to Hagar after she and her son, Ishmael, are sent away by Abraham. Hagar is distraught, fearing for her son’s life in the desert.

The verse reads: Arise, lift up the lad, and hold him in thine hand; for I will make him a great nation.”

This prophecy directly promises that Ishmael will become a great nation. This is a foundational promise, as it assures Hagar of her son’s future and his importance in God’s plan.

2. Isaiah 60, verse 7 (Completion of the Prophecy).

This chapter of Isaiah deals with the future glory of Zion, depicting a time of great prosperity and the gathering of nations to honor God.

The verse reads: “All the flocks of Kedar shall be gathered together unto thee, the rams of Nebaioth shall minister unto thee: they shall come up with acceptance on mine altar, and I will glorify the house of my glory.”

Both Kedar and Nebaioth are descendants of Ishmael. This verse indicates the fulfillment and continuation of the promise given to Hagar, showing that Ishmael’s descendants will play a significant role in the future worship and honor of God.

3. Interconnection and Weight:

The prophecy in Genesis 21, verse 18, is seen as having “more weight” because it is the initial divine promise regarding Ishmael, establishing his importance and future. It is a direct communication from God to Hagar at a crucial moment. Isaiah 60, verse 7, is viewed as the completion or continuation of this promise. It confirms and elaborates on the fulfillment of God’s plan for Ishmael’s descendants, showing their eventual integration into the worship of God and their contribution to the glory of Zion.

The “weight” of Genesis 21, verse 18, lies in its foundational nature, while Isaiah 60, verse 7, provides a more detailed and expanded vision of the fulfillment of that initial promise.

This understanding is conveyed by recognizing that the original promise to Hagar is the cornerstone of the prophecy concerning Ishmael and his descendants.

The later prophetic vision in Isaiah builds upon this foundation, demonstrating the fulfillment of God’s promise in a broader and more comprehensive way. Therefore, while Isaiah 60, verse 7 is significant in its completion of the prophecy, Genesis 21, verse 18, holds a primary and foundational weight in the narrative.

---

---

Search

Search